Grammatical Errors In Writing Procedure Text Made by The Ninth-Grade Students of MTs Unggulan Nuris Jember
Keywords:
grammatical errors, writing, procedure textAbstract
Writing and grammar cannot be separated from each other because grammar is a useful component to make writing well structured. Yet, the fact that the first and foreign languages' rules are dissimilar seems to cause students to still make grammatical errors in English writing. This research aims to highlight the students’ grammatical errors in the writing by applying an error analysis approach to classify the errors committed by the learners while they produce the target language. Two research questions were formulated in this research. 1) what types of grammatical errors are found in writing procedure text made by ninth-grade students of MTs Unggulan Nuris Jember? 2) what is the most frequent type of grammatical errors found in writing procedure text made by ninth-grade students of MTs Unggulan Nuris Jember? The research used a qualitative descriptive research design. The data collected from the original students writing procedure text on making a plate of fried rice. The researcher analyzed the types of grammatical errors in students’ writing based on Dulay, Burt, and Krashen’s theory, whereas the steps of analyzing the errors were adopted from Ellis's theory. The result of analyzing the data showed that the number of errors that occurred was 112 times. The researcher found the types of grammatical errors in students’ writing procedure text made by ninth-grade students were: Omission (44 times), Addition (23 times), Misformation (35 times), Misordering (10 times). The researcher found the most frequent type of grammatical errors made by students’ writing procedure text was in the category error of omission. It was obtained from calculating each category of errors type. The results showed that students still tended to make grammatical errors. Thus, knowing the common types of errors is an important step to inform the teachers where to direct their efforts regarding the most problematic area students face while producing English. It also assists the teachers in devising teaching strategies that might minimize students’ errors.
References
Ary D., Lucy C. J., Chris S., & Asghar R. (2010). Introduction to Research in Education, 8th Edition. Belmont USA: Wadsworth.
Azzar. (2007). Grammar-Based Teaching. A Practitioner’s Perspective. Journal of Education and Practice No.2 (07):1-12
Babala. (2012). Effects of Process Genre Based Approach on the Written English Performance of Computer Science Students in Nigerian Polytecnic. Journal of Education and Practice, (14) 7, 56-87
Brown, H. D. (2003). Language Assessment Principles and Classroom Practices. California: Longman University Press.
Brown, H. D. (2007). Principle of Language Learning and Teaching Fifth Edition.New York:Pearson Education.
Cohen. (1994). Assessing Language Abilityin the Classroom.Boston:Heinle Publisher.
Denzin, N. K. (1978). Sociological Methods:A Sourcebook. New York :McGrawHiil.
Dulay, B., & Krashen, S. D. (1982). Language Two. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Dumais, W. (1988). Writing in English. Jakarta:Departemen Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan.
Rod, E. (2008). Second Language Acquisition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Haris, D. (1998). Testing English as econd Language. New York :Graw Hill Publishing Company
LTD.
Harmer, J. (2001). The Practice of English Language Teaching. London: Longman.
Lynch, T. & Kenneth, A. (2013). English Language Teaching. EdinBurgh: University of EdinBurgh.
Merry & Silalahi. (2018). Errors Analysis on Grammatical as Found on Students Writing Text.
Jurnal Ilmiah Maksitek, 3, No.1: 33-45
Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. H. (2014). Qualitative Data Analysis. America: Arizona State University.
Moleong, L. J. (2007). Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya.
Norrish, J. (2010). Language Learner and Their Errors. London: Mac Millan Publisher.
Nunan. (2005). Practical English Language Teaching. New York:The Mc Graw Hill Companies.
Richard, J. C., & Willy, A. R. (2002) Methodology in Language Teaching: An Anthology of Current
Practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University.
Zaida, N. (2013). Bright An English Course for Junior High School Students. Jakarta: Erlangga.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Hilmi Sofia Wildan, Mega Fariziah Nur Humairah
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.