An Analysis of Cognitive Process Dimension in The Reading Test of English Textbook Entitled “Bupena English” for the Ninth-Grade Students of Junior High School

Authors

  • Zaenol Abidin UIN KHAS Jember
  • As’ari As’ari UIN Kiai Haji Achmad Siddiq Jember

Keywords:

cognitive process dimension, reading test, textbook

Abstract

This study aimed to analyze the category of cognitive process dimension of revised bloom’s taxonomy and the types of reading test in the reading test of English textbook entitled “Bupena English” for ninth-grade students of junior high school. It used a content analysis as the type of qualitative approach. Document analysis was used in collecting the data. The data of this research was the entire of reading test. Based on the finding, the most dominant category represented was "understand" category which consist of 322 items or 40%, and the lowest was create which consist 21 items or 3%. The most dominant type of reading test was "open-ended and miscellaneous items" which consist 21 times or 27%, and one of type reading test which didn't represent in the English textbook was cursory reading.

References

Alderson, J. C. (2003). Assessing Reading. Cambrige: Cambridge University Press.

Al Raqqad, Y. M. & Hanita, H. I. (2019) Analyzing the Reading Questions of AP12

Textbook According to Blooms’ Taxonomy. A International Journal of Education, Psychology, and Counseling, 12 (1): 84-94.

Anderson, Lorin W., David R. Krathwohl. (2001) A Taxonomy for Learning, Teaching, and Assessng. New York: Longman.

Bloom, B. S. (1956) Taxonomy of Educational Objectives. America: Longman.

Brown, H. D. (2003). Language Assessment Principles and Classroom Practices. California: Longman.

Christine, N. (1996). Teaching Reading Skills in a foreign language. Hong Kong: Macnillan.

Cohen, L. M. & Keith, M. (2018) Research Methods in Education, New York: routledge. Daroini, A. I. (2018) Tafsir Ayat Pendidikan dalam Q.S. Al- ‘Alaq Ayat 1-5 Menurut Quraish Shihab. Unpublished Thesis, UIN Raden Intan Lampung.

Donald, A., Lucy, C. J., Chris, S. & Asghar, R. (2010) Introduction to Research in Education: 8th edition. Belmont, USA: Wadsworth.

Gabe, W. (2009). Reading in a Second Language: Moving from Theory to Practice. NewYork: Cambridge University Press.

Heaton, J. B. (1988). Writing English Language Tests: New Edition. London and NewYork: Longman Group.

Qasrawi, R. A. (2020). The Higher and Lower- Order Thinking Skills (HOTS and LOTS) in Unlock English Textbook (1st and 2nd Editions) Based on Bloom’s Taxonomy: An Analysis Study, A Journal of International Online Journal of Education and teaching (IOJET), 7 (2) : 744- 758.

Randip K. V. S. & Azianura H. S. (2019). The Analysis of Higher Order Thinking Skils in English Reading Comprehension Tests in Malaysia, Malaysian Journal of Society and Spaces, 6 (3) : 12-26.

Richards, J. C. (2001). Curriculum Development in Language Teaching. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Usman, B. & Asnawi, M. (2019). Analysis of Reading Comprehension Questions by Using Revised Bloom’s Taxonomy on Higher Order Thinking Skill (HOTS), A Journal of English Education Journal, 3 (2): 1-5.

Downloads

Published

2022-06-27